Posts Tagged Opportunity Qualification
Why BANT No Longer Applies for B2B Lead Qualification
Posted by Rick Pranitis in MARKETING on August 28, 2012
Today’s buyer has unprecedented access to information enabling them to make informed buying decisions, short lists and determine the best fit for their needs without ever speaking to a seller. In fact, recent statistics from Sirius Decisions and Selling Power state that more than 50% of the buying process is completed before a buyer ever engages with a vendor or a sales rep. We are smack in the middle of marketing 2.0, a more “modern” way of marketing that makes BANT (Budget, Authority, Need, Timeframe) no longer effective for several reasons.
This being the case, one has to wonder why many organizations (especially sales people) still want to include BANT as part of their early stage lead qualification criteria? Don’t get me wrong – I do believe that in any sales process a sales rep should discuss these key criteria with their prospects. However, this should come later in the sales cycle, once the sales rep has defined some kind of relationship.
Here are a few reasons why BANT is not relevant for lead qualification:
Traditional Buying is Dead
Not long ago DemandGen Report ran a research report focused on the B2B buyer. One of the questions was as follows – “Did the buying path follow a traditional path where budget was established, criteria outlined, and then an RFP distributed to a pre-set list of solution providers?” No surprise that 83.3% of B2B buyers answered “no” to this question, a signal that indeed the traditional ways of buying are a thing of the past. Now think about these 83.3% in terms of BANT – while they were in the buying process, all would have been disqualified because of not being able to identify budget.
Buyers Lie
I’ll be honest – I’ve answered the budget, need and timeframe fields on a form simply to gain access to the information being offered. If it is a required field, do buyers have a choice? In a recent study, only 29% of B2B buyers said they “always” supply accurate information on custom questions on a web form. This means that 7 in 10 are lying about that information and that includes BANT. By requiring BANT in the early stages of the qualification process, you are inducing false-positives and leaving the buyers no choice but to provide information that is inaccurate. It is no wonder why Tony Jaros of Sirius Decisions stated, “B-A-N-T are the four most dangerous letters in B2B marketing.”
Implicit is far Better
I recently spent some time with a sales team developing their lead qualification model when the discussion of BANT arose. As usual some were for it and others had some serious questions. The EVP of Sales broke the tie when he stated “if we can get the right demographic criteria and understand how they are behaving and interacting with us, I will leave it to my rep’s to help them build the business case, show the need and help their prospect get the needed budget.” Case closed.
What this EVP of sales understood is that speaking to the right person who has shown through their “digital body language” that they are interested and have a potential need, is far better than having one give a criteria that could be faulty. This underscores the need for a well-defined lead qualification process between marketing and sales based on implicit and explicit criteria. Ultimately, this will produce a much more qualified lead than BANT.
Group Thinking
One of the other key characteristics of the B2B buying cycle today is that buyers purchase in groups. Very rarely is there one sole decision maker who approves buying decisions. The need to appeal to and message to a buying group including all levels of management is vital. As a result, each of these group members will have a unique perspective on the buying process and this perspective cannot be identified with BANT as the qualification barometer.
While we have entered this new age of modern marketing and moving away from traditional means of qualification, this is not something that marketers should dread. This change is good! It allows us to better identify our buyers, provide better information to sales and deliver more relevant content to our buyers enabling them to make a more informed buying process.
If you have not killed BANT in your lead qualification process, do it now. Start smart and begin focusing on the buying signals and behavior to get a more qualified lead and ultimately more conversions for sales. BANT is dead!
.
.
.
This article originally appeared in The Annutas Group – Lead Management Outlet Blog on August 28, 2012.
.
.
.
Three Critical Questions For B2B Sales:
Posted by Rick Pranitis in GENERAL DISCUSSION, OTHER CONTENT on August 9, 2012
Three critical questions for B2B sales: Why Change? Why Now? Why You?
Your company is facing an increasingly strong competitor – but you won’t find them listed in any Google search of the key players in your marketplace. But this competitor is playing a powerful and often-undefined role in almost every significant B2B buying decision. And it’s the reason why a growing number of your apparently well-qualified opportunities are ending up with the prospect deciding to “do nothing”.
Have you recognized the competitor yet? It’s the status quo – and in today’s increasingly risk-averse decision-making climate, where it may be harder than ever before to get approval for discretionary investments, your prospects might think that sticking with the status quo is the safest option open to them. You need to persuade them otherwise. And you need to make the case for change before you make the case for your solution.
Is the status quo holding you back?
Before you can expect to win their business, you need to play your part in persuading all the key stakeholders in the buying decision process that the cost and risk of change significantly outweigh the cost and risk of the investment you are asking them to make – and that your offering represents the least risky of all the options open to them – including the decision to “do nothing”.
Let’s be clear. If you haven’t done all you can to persuade the prospect of the need for change, you probably don’t deserve their business. Yet I still observe experienced sales people rushing in to propose their company’s product or service offerings while the prospect is still unclear or unconvinced about whether they need to let go of the status quo.
The truth about burning platforms and compelling events
Sometimes you’ll get lucky, and the prospect will already have concluded that they are standing on a “burning platform”, or face a truly “compelling event”. But don’t be surprised if, during the course of your sales process, the flames start looking a little more bearable, or if the upcoming event seems just that little less compelling.
The answer is in your hands. As Tom Pisello of Alinean points out in a recent webinar, you need to make sure that the key stakeholders in your prospect understand why they need to change, why they need to do it now, and why they need to work with you to accomplish it. And until you’ve successfully navigated the “why change?” and “why now?” questions, you ought to be very cautious about investing a lot of sales effort in trying to answer the question “why us?”
It’s why I’ve been advising clients to test that their prospects recognize the case for change early in the sales process – and if a clear case does not yet exist, to work with the key stakeholders to either create one or to exclude the opportunity from any sales forecast until and unless the case has been made and agreed by the prospect.
No case for change? no deal!
Failure to make the case for change is one of the most common root causes when I conduct pipeline analysis to help prospects understand why opportunities are stuck or being lost to a decision to do nothing. But the impact is deceptive, because the effects often show up later in the sales cycle.
If you’re suffering from a rash of stuck late-stage sales opportunities, I strongly recommend that you investigate whether an adequate case for change had been made and agreed earlier on in the sales process. Don’t be surprised if your sales people turn out to be suffering from a condition I have come to refer to as “premature elaboration”.
Six steps to making a compelling case for change
In order to establish the strongest possible case for change, I recommend that you coach your sales people to lead their prospects through the following six-step process, and that you provide them with the sales tools and marketing messages to implement them. Don’t be put off if this approach at first appears rather long winded: try it, get the “case for change” foundation built right, and you’ll be surprised how fast the subsequent stages in the buying process can be driven – and how many fewer well-qualified opportunities end in “do nothing” decisions.
1: Start building the foundation by sharing valuable insights with the prospect – you want to stimulate them to adopt a fresh perspective about what they need, and have them believe that you can help them make smart decisions that will take their business forward
2: Next, develop those insights into specific issues that directly affect their current business situation – these could be specific could be problems they need to address, goals they need to achieve, or opportunities they need to realize
3: Third, and most critically, help them to calculate for themselves the impact on their business of failing to address the issue – and to conclude that action needs to be taken sooner, rather than later
4: Before jumping in and proposing your product or service solution, explain why your approach is the one most likely to help them deal with the issue. Focus on how and why you do what you do, rather than the details of what you offer
5: Once you’ve clearly differentiated your approach from all the other options open to them, now – at last – you can show how your (carefully selected) capabilities directly address the issues you have established earlier
6: Finally, eliminate as much risk as possible from the equation by proving (with tangible, relevant evidence) how your approach and capabilities are going to help them accomplish the needed change successfully
So – are your marketing and sales processes successfully building a compelling case for change? Are they providing clear answers to “why change?” “why now?” and “why you?”. Or, if not, are you really happy with all the wasted effort that will have been devoted to the rash of decisions to “do nothing” that will inevitably result?
.
Originally posted on Accelerating Revenue Growth: The Inflexion-Point Blog by Bob Apollo on August 9, 2012
.
.
.