Archive for August, 2012

Dealing With Your Emotions

Salespeople need to address emotions. It doesn’t help to obsess about rejection and disappointment. It’s easy to fall into the poor-me syndrome or fall prey to negative emotions, such as hurt, anger, or fear. But the most successful salespeople find ways to get over it, stay focused, and continue on.

When you’re feeling down in the dumps, rethink the way you evaluate sales performance. Instead of evaluating yourself on the number of closed sales, look at the progress you’re making in each component of the overall sales process. It’s very possible that you’re accomplishing positive things, such as securing more appointments, making more presentations, and meeting more decision makers.

.

.

.

Originally posted in Personal Selling Power ™ Daily Boost of Positivity – August 31, 2012

.

.

.

 

, ,

No Comments

Do You Know Your Customers’ Customer?

It’s often the simple or obvious things which escape notice leaving sales people frustrated and wondering what to do next.  The knee-jerk response to this question is more times than not; “Yes!”   But, if you stop and really think; How much do you know about your customers’ customer?

This may seem like an odd question, but it really is relevant.  Sometimes I find that salespeople are incredibly knowledgeable about their product or service, but they forget to broaden their perspective to try to see things through the eyes of their customers’ customer.

Put in the effort to truly find out what motivates your customers’ customer.  When you understand their decision-making process better, you will be more equipped to meet the needs and wants of your customer.

Obviously a good way to find out more is simply by being curious and asking more questions — and then asking more follow-up questions.  Yes, you can find out a lot from talking with your customer, but it’s even better if you can find opportunities to interact with the end-user of the product or service.

You might be surprised at what you learn.  And you likely will discover vital information that can be revolutionary to your selling process and bottom-line.

So, chew on this question for awhile and answer it honestly:  Do you know your customer’s customer?

.

.

.

This article was originally posted to AG SALESWORKS on August 28, 2012 in Sales Productivity

.

.

.

 

, , , ,

No Comments

Why BANT No Longer Applies for B2B Lead Qualification

Today’s buyer has unprecedented access to information enabling them to make informed buying decisions, short lists and determine the best fit for their needs without ever speaking to a seller.  In fact, recent statistics from Sirius Decisions and Selling Power state that more than 50% of the buying process is completed before a buyer ever engages with a vendor or a sales rep.  We are smack in the middle of marketing 2.0, a more “modern” way of marketing that makes BANT (Budget, Authority, Need, Timeframe) no longer effective for several reasons.

This being the case, one has to wonder why many organizations (especially sales people) still want to include BANT as part of their early stage lead qualification criteria?  Don’t get me wrong – I do believe that in any sales process a sales rep should discuss these key criteria with their prospects.  However, this should come later in the sales cycle, once the sales rep has defined some kind of relationship.

Here are a few reasons why BANT is not relevant for lead qualification:

Traditional Buying is Dead

Not long ago DemandGen Report ran a research report focused on the B2B buyer.  One of the questions was as follows – “Did the buying path follow a traditional path where budget was established, criteria outlined, and then an RFP distributed to a pre-set list of solution providers?”  No surprise that 83.3% of B2B buyers answered “no” to this question, a signal that indeed the traditional ways of buying are a thing of the past. Now think about these 83.3% in terms of BANT – while they were in the buying process, all would have been disqualified because of not being able to identify budget.

Buyers Lie

I’ll be honest – I’ve answered the budget, need and timeframe fields on a form simply to gain access to the information being offered.  If it is a required field, do buyers have a choice?  In a recent study, only 29% of B2B buyers said they “always” supply accurate information on custom questions on a web form.  This means that 7 in 10 are lying about that information and that includes BANT.  By requiring BANT in the early stages of the qualification process, you are inducing false-positives and leaving the buyers no choice but to provide information that is inaccurate.  It is no wonder why Tony Jaros of Sirius Decisions stated, “B-A-N-T are the four most dangerous letters in B2B marketing.”

Implicit is far Better

I recently spent some time with a sales team developing their lead qualification model when the discussion of BANT arose.  As usual some were for it and others had some serious questions.  The EVP of Sales broke the tie when he stated “if we can get the right demographic criteria and understand how they are behaving and interacting with us, I will leave it to my rep’s to help them build the business case, show the need and help their prospect get the needed budget.”  Case closed.

What this EVP of sales understood is that speaking to the right person who has shown through their “digital body language” that they are interested and have a potential need, is far better than having one give a criteria that could be faulty.  This underscores the need for a well-defined lead qualification process between marketing and sales based on implicit and explicit criteria.  Ultimately, this will produce a much more qualified lead than BANT.

Group Thinking

One of the other key characteristics of the B2B buying cycle today is that buyers purchase in groups.  Very rarely is there one sole decision maker who approves buying decisions.  The need to appeal to and message to a buying group including all levels of management is vital.  As a result, each of these group members will have a unique perspective on the buying process and this perspective cannot be identified with BANT as the qualification barometer.

While we have entered this new age of modern marketing and moving away from traditional means of qualification, this is not something that marketers should dread.  This change is good! It allows us to better identify our buyers, provide better information to sales and deliver more relevant content to our buyers enabling them to make a more informed buying process.

If you have not killed BANT in your lead qualification process, do it now.  Start smart and begin focusing on the buying signals and behavior to get a more qualified lead and ultimately more conversions for sales.  BANT is dead!

.

.

.

This article originally appeared in The Annutas GroupLead Management Outlet Blog on August 28, 2012.

.

.

.

, ,

No Comments

Selling value – an innovative framing

Anyone who knows me can tell you I am constantly scanning the web for interesting articles relating to Sales and Marketing.  This article recently caught my eye, and I agree with the author’s comment it’s a new twist on an old – yet still very much valid – concept of value being key to successful selling.
.
.
.

Source: www.salestrainingconnection.com

, , , , ,

No Comments

Keys to Building a Startup Sales Team

Okay, you’ve developed an innovative product or service and you ‘hung your shingle’ out to the world a couple of years ago.  Lo and behold, your idea took off and you’re making good progress – and a little profit as well.  Congratulations!   Now you’re telling yourself it’s time to expand, add a few people to your organization, AND hire a sales team to really make the business grow.

These days that’s great news from any perspective.  I’m all about building and growing business.  Here are some things you should keep in mind to help guide your expansion and keep you on the growth (and profitability) track.

  • Don’t hire sales people too early.  In the early days (and even if you’re a couple of years into the start-up, it’s still the early days) you the founder should be able to sell (and should be selling).
  • You don’t need sales people, you need sales.  Don’t think VP of Sales — think Revenue Engineer.  (Not the greatest analogy, but just like you won’t hire a development ‘manager’ as one of the first five people in a start-up, you shouldn’t hire a sales ‘manager’ either).  Don’t get caught up in fancy titles — focus on dollars in the door.
  • Don’t hire several sales people at once.  Your goal is to figure out the pattern of what kinds of people are best based on what you’re selling and who you’re selling it to.  You need some feedback from the system so you can continue to iterate on your hires.
  • If you’ve never hired or been around sales people before, be prepared for a bit of a shock to the system.  They’re not bad people, they’re just different.  If you’re somewhat of an introverted geek, it’s helpful to remember that your start-up needs to sell stuff.
  • Resist the temptation to create complicated compensation plans.  If it requires a spreadsheet to figure out the commission, it’s too hard.  You’ll have plenty of time to confuse sales people later — start simple.
  •  Agile methodologies can work in sales as well.  Iterate!  Refine your demo script, your slides, and any other collateral information.  Capture the lessons learned by the best-performing people and spread it to the rest.
  • Sales people will generally act in mostly rational (but often surprising) ways based on incentives.  The rules-of-the-game defines the behavior of the players.  Be forewarned!
  • You should always connect incentives somehow to ultimate customer happiness.  If you reward just “deals getting done”, you’ll get deals — but at too high a price.  You might get push-back that sales people don’t control/influence customer happiness, but they do.  They “pick” customers, they set expectations, they control the degree of “convincing” applied.
  • Make sure you understand the economics of your business.  Figure out your total COCA (Cost of Customer Acquisition).  This includes sales people, marketing people and marketing campaigns.  Quick example:  Let’s say you paid a sales person $10k, a marketing person $10k and you spent $5k on Google AdWords (for a total of $25k) last month.  If you sold 10 customers last month, your COCA is about $2,500.  Different businesses have different needs in terms of sales vs. marketing spend.  Make sure neither is too far out of whack.
  • Your Life-Time-Value (LTV – how much revenue you expect to generate per customer) should be higher than your COCA.  No, you don’t need a degree from MIT to figure that out.  Once your LTV is a multiple of your COCA, you’re ready to start turning the knob and scaling the business a bit (hiring more sales people).  But, if your LTV is way lower than your COCA, proceed with caution.  If there is no hope for LTV getting higher than COCA, you’ve got a problem.  Don’t try to hire additional sales people until the economics sort of make sense.
  • Track data maniacally (even if it’s just in a spreadsheet).  Information you will want includes:  What was sold, who sold it, when, for how much, etc.  This data will be invaluable later as you start to scale.  For example, you should be able to answer the question:  We had 14 customers cancel last month — who sold those customers?  Is there a pattern?  In the early days, you likely won’t have the volume (or the time) to analyze the data — but you should at least capture it for future use.
  • Your pricing should be in line with your sales structure.  For example, you can’t expect to have an outside sales force (that meets with customers in person) if your average deal size doesn’t cover your cost of sales.  The math won’t work.
  • Once you get beyond three or so people, running your sales in a spreadsheet will become painful.  Start looking at CRM systems (like Salesforce.com).
  • Start watching the shape of your ‘funnel’ as early as possible.  How many leads are you getting a month?  How many turn into opportunities?  How many of those convert into paying customers?  Once you understand your funnel, you can slowly start tweaking your system to fix the ‘leaks’.

I know this is a lot to juggle along with running your business and everything else you have on your plate.  But if you want to keep your company, and your profits, growing you have to accept the fact ‘expansion’ means more than just adding bodies to the personnel roster.

.

.

.

 

 

, , ,

No Comments

The Dangers of Discounting

This article is over two years old, but I think it is well worth repeating.  Too often sales people fall into the trap of “I have to make the sale no matter what”, and forget the impact of their actions – not to mention the responsibility they have to their organization and fellow employees.

You know how difficult it can be out there to maintain your effective pricing strategy.  How often have you been drawn into a price battle with your customer, with the biggest threat going through your mind that you’ll lose the sale if you don’t discount?

Before you do offer a discounted price, bear in mind the following dangers associated with lowering your original figure:

  • When you offer discount, you set a precedent.  The new price you offer is the reference point from which your customer will start negotiating.  When you discount, it’s telling the customer that’s the starting point, and it’s going to be mighty difficult to raise prices again in the future.
  • Your pricing point creates an image for your product and your company.  By discounting, you effectively reposition your brand message.  You are sending the message that your product isn’t as good as you say it is, and you turn it into a commodity, rather than something of value to the customer.
  • You tell your competition you are willing to start a price war.  When your competition see you discount, they will retaliate by cutting prices, and it’s a downward spiral.
  • You are less profitable, and you earn less money.  You become more dependent on a price-only strategy, eventually leading to a policy that focuses less on what you can do for the customer and more on cutting costs.  This means you have less to invest in R&D and product enhancement, stifling your growth and leading to poorer quality.
  • You send the message to your customers that, because your focus is on discounting, you might as well shop around for the cheapest price anywhere, because I have nothing to offer you but a lower price.
  • Since the only way your company makes money is through the profits you bring in, you have to start looking inside your company to cut costs.  You start asking questions like ‘how can we save a little on quality costs?’ and ‘do we need all these people to support our discounting salespeople?   You have to cut costs on the inside because you aren’t making the profits on the outside.
  • You tell the whole world that your products and services are not as valuable as you suggest they are, making the customer wonder where else you might not be strictly honest.

If you do a study on just how much your discounts actually cost your company.  You may be surprised by how much your short-term thinking affects your long-term prosperity.

.

.

This article originally appeared on The MTD Sales Blog posted by Sean McPeatJuly 2, 2010

.

.

.

.

, , ,

No Comments

Dealing with Those Dreaded Objections

This is a great article by Mike Schultz, publisher of Rain Today.  He deals with an issue that continues to plague not just newer sales people.  Even some of us veterans to the profession require subtle reminders, the occasional reality check and an attitude boost.  I think he covers the topic perfectly, and his advice here should be a revisited regularly – regardless of how long you’ve been selling.  

.

Your price is too high…

It’s not the right time…

I don’t need your service…

Those five simple words in each sentence can leave you feeling like you just got back from a high school dance: undervalued, rejected, and ignored. (Really, it’s not you. It’s me.) Any of these might cause you to back away when you hear them. With this attitude, it’s no wonder so many sellers wilt upon the first sign of an objection. They shouldn’t.

In fact, objections are often a hidden indicator of interest. They’re always an opportunity to understand your prospect better, and more often than you might think you’ll move him closer to the sale while you address them.

Objections can be overcome. Here’s some insight into how.

Definition: An objection is an explicit expression from a buyer that a barrier exists between the current situation and what he needs to engage your services. In other words, it is a clear signal that you have more work to do in the selling process.

Your objective: Overcome the objection and make advances towards gaining commitment from the prospect with the following caveats firmly in mind:

  • The close begins the relationship: In product selling, overcoming objections at all costs is the typical message sellers are taught. This does not work for selling professional services. If you just plow through the objection without addressing it fully, the underlying reason for the objection will usually come back to haunt you. Remember, you have to work with these people once you are done selling.
  • Objections often have merit: Most sales training teaches us to “rebut” objections-counter them with logic, arguments, and sheer will power. In selling services, your purpose is to understand the objection fully, isolate it, and respond to it appropriately.
  • Many objections take a process, not a quick answer, to overcome: Services selling is complex with many buyers and buying criteria. You may need to build a case for overcoming an objection instead of answering quickly on the fly. Some objections, on the other hand, may simply be questions that have to be answered.

6 Steps to Get Closer to the Sale

Objections are not such horrible things. When the prospect indicates that he is not quite ready to engage your services (he voices an objection), you should not be deterred. As a matter of fact, you now have the opportunity to understand your prospect better and move him closer to the sale by following these six steps:

1. Listen fully to the objection (don’t interrupt or anticipate). Fight the common urge to respond immediately to an objection. By doing so, you will hear what is actually on the prospect’s mind rather than what you think he objects to. You will be surprised how much you can learn about what is actually at the heart of the objection.

2. Ask permission to completely understand the issue. The simple act of asking permission to understand lets the prospect know that you respect his concerns. This further establishes you as a confident consultant.

3. Ask questions, restate or clarify the objection. Make sure you get it right and/or uncover the real objection. Many objections are hiding underlying issues that the prospect either can’t or is not ready to articulate.

4. Choose your response carefully and keep it short. Answer honestly and to the point. Long-winded responses very quickly begin to sound artificial and insincere.

5. Propose your resolution to overcome the objection. Simply enough, describe exactly how you are going to remove the barrier for the prospect.

6. Ask whether your answer or proposed solution will satisfy the objection. Don’t always take “yes” for an answer immediately. Many a prospect will accept the solution in the moment, but once you are out of sight, the objection still remains. Be certain you have moved the sale forward.

It’s important that you don’t disregard client objections. They are a crucial part of the sales process that accomplished rainmakers handle with finesse to move the prospect closer to the close.

.

.

This article originally appeared in the RainMakerBlog ™ as “Dealing with Those Dreaded Objections

.

.

.

 

, , ,

No Comments

Steering Clear of Common (and avoidable) Sales Distractions

Ever get to the end of the day and wonder first, what happened with all that time and second why didn’t I get nearly as much done as I should have?  Time is, as the cliché goes, the most scarce resource we have.  Yet even though we know each day what needs to get done, we find ways to put it off just a little more.

Salespeople are no different. Even the most successful sales people will fitter away the day, and put off critical pipeline-building tasks that aren’t nearly as onerous as they feel when you’re in the midst of procrastination.  Here are seven of the most common and deadly distractions, as well as some easy steps to mitigate or eliminate them.

1. Email
As a sales professional, you want to be responsive to prospects.  But that doesn’t mean you need to respond within seconds, or even minutes.  What’s most, the vast majority of email you receive isn’t from prospects or anybody that’s going to help you close more business.  The majority of email you receive represents someone else’s priorities, not yours.

Do your best to distinguish the urgent from the important, but better yet, keep your email in offline mode most of the time.  What you need to do right now likely has nothing to do with what might come into your inbox three minutes from now.  And for the emails you want to receive but can easily read later, set up some inbox rules to automatically file them in folders you’ll check at the end of the day, or just a couple times a week.

2. Social media
Let’s assume for a moment you aren’t checking your personal Facebook every 15 minutes.  That’s a big enough distraction on its own.  But even if you’re actively practicing social selling, you can suck up hours a day and justify it as prospecting, even though you’re mostly clicking around without a real strategy or direction.

Social media is increasingly an important, daily tool for sales professionals to prospect and manage their pipelines, but this time (like everything) needs to be managed and contained.  Have a strategy and process for how you’re going to engage in social selling each day.  Use a checklist, if necessary, to get in, do your work, and get out. As little as 15 minutes a day can do it, if you stay focused.

3. The general Web
We’re all adults here, so I’m not a big fan at all of blocking Web sites in a corporate environment.  Your team will just spend more time trying to get around that, or use their mobile devices.   But sometimes when we face a difficult or daunting task, we decide to check the news headlines one more time.

There are sites and services that will help manage your time on these sites.  Rescue Time, for example, will show you exactly how much time you’re actively doing productive work vs. killing time elsewhere. There’s nothing wrong with taking a quick brain break to check some scores or Hollywood gossip, just be cognizant of how quickly you’re able to get your mind back focused on what really matters.

4. Floor gossip
There’s a difference between sharing best practices and sharing gossip.  Sometimes – when it comes to customer or prospect situations – it’s a pretty thin line.  There aren’t any Rescue Time-like apps for people hanging over your cube.  But be aware that this is probably taking more time away from selling time than you think.  And you both have a quota to hit.

5. Caffeine
There’s a point of diminishing returns for the morning (and afternoon) Joe, or those silly little red bottles.  You get the energy and high, sure, but that often comes with mental jitters.  If you were likely to get distracted by something new or more fun or different before, caffeine makes it more so.

I don’t have a problem with using the caffeine source of your choice to help get started, but know it can have an adverse affect too.

6. Follow up tasks
After almost any sales call, you have work to do.  Update records in your CRM.  Prepare a proposal.  Get details or coordinate next steps with a sales engineer.  There’s no getting around these tasks, and they’re often instrumental to hitting your number.

But if you do them separately after each call, it forces you to engage in each system too many times over the course of the day.  Instead, wait until several calls have been completed and tackle your follow-up duties all at once.  Updating multiple records in your CRM at once will take far less time than logging in multiple times throughout the day.

7. Victory laps
You just had a great call with a prospect.  They were engaged, and agreed to next steps.  You’re excited, and you should be.  But instead of channeling that energy into the next call, you get up and talk to others about it.  Brag to your manager.  Tell someone else on your way for another cup of coffee.  And before you know it, it’s 30 minutes later and you’re still on that victory lap.  Don’t cut the laps out entirely.  Just be careful about their duration and frequency.

There are other distractions to be sure.  Which ones are your demons?  And what are you doing to keep them from holding you back?

.

.

.

.

, , ,

No Comments

Fewer than 20% of sales organizations continually track buying behavior

I found this announcement to be very disturbing, and I think you should too.  Fewer than 20% of the 600 plus companies surveyed by CSO Insights in their 2012 Sales Management Optimization Study had the discipline to continually track specific buying behaviors in order to assess the true state of their sales pipelines. More than half never bothered to track buying behavior, or only did so in an ad-hoc fashion.  The majority of the sales organizations surveyed – a representative cross section of businesses across multiple verticals and geographies – appear to be relying primarily on self-reported sales activity, rather than insisting on provable evidence of buying behavior when it comes to managing their sales pipelines.

So perhaps it’s no wonder that sales forecast accuracy continues to bedevil most sales organizations, with on average less than half of forecasted deals actually closing at the time or for the value predicted by the sales person.  However, the sales organizations that had implemented buying cycle tracking did far better.  If you want a simple justification for why it’s worth insisting that your sales people provide evidence of their prospect’s buying behavior, consider this: the sales organizations that did so won nearly 40% more of their forecasted deals than the organizations that paid no attention to it – and had far fewer losses and “no decisions”.  If you’re among the 80% of sales organizations that could and should be doing better, you must start by aligning your pipeline stages with the key phases in your prospect’s buying decision process.  At each stage, you must anticipate your prospect’s likely intentions, concerns and motivations, and align your sales activities accordingly. But most important, you must establish clear milestones between each stage of the pipeline that can only be navigated if your sales person can provide reliable evidence that the prospect has made a significant, observable and clearly defined step forward in their buying process.

 CSO Insights make one particular recommendation that I believe every sales organization needs to implement as a basic discipline: after every significant interaction with the prospect, and most particularly when needs are identified, requirements established or the decision process or criteria agreed, the sales person must record their understanding in an email to the prospect and have the prospect correct or agree their assumptions – and attach the correspondence to the opportunity record in the CRM system.  If you implement this process – and given the dramatically better performance shown by organizations that have embraced this, I can’t imagine why you would not – you need to be prepared for a reality check.

 Inevitably, applying a rigorous, evidence-based approach to accurately placing your prospects in your pipeline based on the true state of their buying decision process will mean that a number of opportunities will slip backwards or fall out of the pipeline altogether. This may make it appear that your pipeline has shrunk.  But these deals were never real – or as well advanced as you thought – in the first place.  And you will be far better off flushing them out rather than continuing to fool yourself.  If you’re one of the 4 in 5 sales organizations that could and should be doing better, I’d encourage you to start today by:

  • Redefining your pipeline stages to reflect the buying process
  • Establishing clearly defined gates or milestones between each stage based on observable evidence of buying behavior
  • Insisting that your sales people re-qualify every opportunity and review their conclusions with you – backed by the evidence
  • Insisting that your sales people document their agreements and assumptions and validate them with the prospect

 Your prospects will appreciate it – your organization will come across as highly professional.  But most important of all, you could end up winning as much as 40% more of your forecasted opportunities.

.

.

.

.

, , ,

No Comments

Three Critical Questions For B2B Sales:

Three critical questions for B2B sales: Why Change? Why Now? Why You?

Your company is facing an increasingly strong competitor – but you won’t find them listed in any Google search of the key players in your marketplace. But this competitor is playing a powerful and often-undefined role in almost every significant B2B buying decision. And it’s the reason why a growing number of your apparently well-qualified opportunities are ending up with the prospect deciding to “do nothing”.

Have you recognized the competitor yet? It’s the status quo – and in today’s increasingly risk-averse decision-making climate, where it may be harder than ever before to get approval for discretionary investments, your prospects might think that sticking with the status quo is the safest option open to them. You need to persuade them otherwise. And you need to make the case for change before you make the case for your solution.

Is the status quo holding you back?

Before you can expect to win their business, you need to play your part in persuading all the key stakeholders in the buying decision process that the cost and risk of change significantly outweigh the cost and risk of the investment you are asking them to make – and that your offering represents the least risky of all the options open to them – including the decision to “do nothing”.

Let’s be clear. If you haven’t done all you can to persuade the prospect of the need for change, you probably don’t deserve their business. Yet I still observe experienced sales people rushing in to propose their company’s product or service offerings while the prospect is still unclear or unconvinced about whether they need to let go of the status quo.

The truth about burning platforms and compelling events

Sometimes you’ll get lucky, and the prospect will already have concluded that they are standing on a “burning platform”, or face a truly “compelling event”. But don’t be surprised if, during the course of your sales process, the flames start looking a little more bearable, or if the upcoming event seems just that little less compelling.

The answer is in your hands. As Tom Pisello of Alinean points out in a recent webinar, you need to make sure that the key stakeholders in your prospect understand why they need to change, why they need to do it now, and why they need to work with you to accomplish it. And until you’ve successfully navigated the “why change?” and “why now?” questions, you ought to be very cautious about investing a lot of sales effort in trying to answer the question “why us?”

It’s why I’ve been advising clients to test that their prospects recognize the case for change early in the sales process – and if a clear case does not yet exist, to work with the key stakeholders to either create one or to exclude the opportunity from any sales forecast until and unless the case has been made and agreed by the prospect.

No case for change? no deal!

Failure to make the case for change is one of the most common root causes when I conduct pipeline analysis to help prospects understand why opportunities are stuck or being lost to a decision to do nothing. But the impact is deceptive, because the effects often show up later in the sales cycle.

If you’re suffering from a rash of stuck late-stage sales opportunities, I strongly recommend that you investigate whether an adequate case for change had been made and agreed earlier on in the sales process. Don’t be surprised if your sales people turn out to be suffering from a condition I have come to refer to as “premature elaboration”.

Six steps to making a compelling case for change

In order to establish the strongest possible case for change, I recommend that you coach your sales people to lead their prospects through the following six-step process, and that you provide them with the sales tools and marketing messages to implement them. Don’t be put off if this approach at first appears rather long winded: try it, get the “case for change” foundation built right, and you’ll be surprised how fast the subsequent stages in the buying process can be driven – and how many fewer well-qualified opportunities end in “do nothing” decisions.

1: Start building the foundation by sharing valuable insights with the prospect – you want to stimulate them to adopt a fresh perspective about what they need, and have them believe that you can help them make smart decisions that will take their business forward

2: Next, develop those insights into specific issues that directly affect their current business situation – these could be specific could be problems they need to address, goals they need to achieve, or opportunities they need to realize

3: Third, and most critically, help them to calculate for themselves the impact on their business of failing to address the issue – and to conclude that action needs to be taken sooner, rather than later

4: Before jumping in and proposing your product or service solution, explain why your approach is the one most likely to help them deal with the issue. Focus on how and why you do what you do, rather than the details of what you offer

5: Once you’ve clearly differentiated your approach from all the other options open to them, now – at last – you can show how your (carefully selected) capabilities directly address the issues you have established earlier

6: Finally, eliminate as much risk as possible from the equation by proving (with tangible, relevant evidence) how your approach and capabilities are going to help them accomplish the needed change successfully

So – are your marketing and sales processes successfully building a compelling case for change? Are they providing clear answers to “why change?” “why now?” and “why you?”. Or, if not, are you really happy with all the wasted effort that will have been devoted to the rash of decisions to “do nothing” that will inevitably result?

.

Originally posted on Accelerating Revenue Growth: The Inflexion-Point Blog by Bob Apollo on August 9, 2012

.

.

.

 

, , ,

No Comments